Tuesday, August 25, 2020
US V. Aluminum Co. Of America Essay US V. Aluminum Co. Of America Presentation Case diagram Ã The United States V. Aluminum Co. Of America was a case that included the central legislature of the United States of America against the Aluminum Company of America and its auxiliaries. As the offended party, the government blamed the organization and one for its auxiliaries of plotting with other outside elements to build up an imposing business model in the aluminum showcase both in the United States and abroad. Mutually with a Canadian organization specifically aluminum constrained, the Aluminum Company of America was blamed for framing a cartel known as The Alliance. As indicated by the conditions of the understanding marked in 1931, the portions of the subsequent organization were given to the signatories joined by a creation amount for each offer held. Also, the partnership was allowed to sell its items at any value that it considers reasonable and no gathering to the understanding should sell or purchase aluminum from any individual who was not an individual from the union (Hall, 37). A second understanding that was marked by the gatherings in 1936 surrendered the previous arrangement of genuine portions and supplanted it with eminence framework. Despite the fact that the United States was excluded from the quantities in the principal understanding, the individuals from the coalition remembered it for the subsequent understanding. In light of this, the central administration of the US of American organized legitimate procedures against the aluminum organization of America and aluminum restricted of Canada. In its introduction, the national gov ernment blamed the two organizations for abusing the Sherman demonstration which restricts organizations from taking part in agreements and collusions that are planned for limiting exchange among states or abroad nations. Ã The preliminary started on June first 1938 in the locale court and it went on for a long time. In the wake of tuning in to the contentions made by the gatherings, the court excused the case. In his decision, the made a decision about expressed that the activities of the organization didn't abuse the Sherman Act nor did they confine aluminum exchange among the states and in remote markets. As per the proof created under the watchful eye of him, the appointed authority likewise noticed that the enormous piece of the overall industry delighted in by the organization was because of its capacity to foresee changes in the market combined with its boss promoting and circulation systems. After the case was excused by the locale court, the offended party petitioned for an intrigue. At first, the intrigue should be taken care of by the United States Supreme Court yet was moved to the Court of Appeals (Hand, et al, 36). This exchange came about because of the reality the Supreme Court could n't achieve the necessary majority of six appointed authorities to tune in to the case. In conveying their judgment, the circuit makes a decision about expressed that in spite of the fact that the understandings made by investors of the collusion were made abroad, they influenced aluminum imports in America. In view of this, the court of claims overruled the prior judgment of the region court and announced activities of the Aluminum Company of America and its partners illicit. An outline of the legitimate issues for the situation Ã There were four significant lawful issues that emerged during the case. The primary lawful issue was whether the Aluminum Company of America picked up restraining infrastructure over the virgin aluminum ingot unjustifiably. Since its initial years, the organization had been in the matter of creating and selling ingot aluminum. The organization utilized customary methods of mining and liquefying aluminum until 1892 when Bradley found that purifying should be possible without utilizing outside warmth. This procedure guaranteed a major economy in the creation of aluminum. So the aluminum organization of America could get authorization to utilize this method, it went into a concurrence with Bradley (Hand, et al, 53). As per the details of this understanding, the organization would BradleyÃ¢â¬â¢s innovation to make Aluminum and consequently, sell the appointee an unknown measure of aluminum at a rebate beneath its market costs. Aluminum extraction is a procedure that devours a ton o f power. In light of this, the American aluminum organization gotten the significant force providers. As indicated by the provisions of the agreement, these force organizations shouldn't offer capacity to whatever other organization that is associated with the production of aluminum. These two demonstrations made the organization the sole biggest maker of aluminum in the nation. The primary lawful issue here was to decide if the restraining infrastructure delighted in by the organization coming about because of these two understandings was legitimate or not. Ã The second legitimate issue that emerged in the procedures was whether the aluminum organization of America was blameworthy of being engaged with criminal operations; it built up its restraining infrastructure in the aluminum business in America. In its application, the government of the United States needed the court to discover the exercises of litigant unlawful not just in light of the fact that they assumed a job in the foundation of its restraining infrastructure yet in addition they were intended to smother its rivals. This issue was isolated into three general classifications. The main class was to consider the acquisition of water fume and the bauxite stores (Hall, 36). The Aluminum Company of America and its abroad auxiliaries purchased up all bauxite stores in all the significant sources including Arkansas and different abroad sources. The offended party contended that the organization purchased more bauxite than it required demonstrating that the buy was not for guaran teeing enough flexibly yet bolting out contenders. The subsequent classification was to think about the concealment of different players in the aluminum business and manufactured products. As noted before in the paper, the Aluminum Company of America gotten the significant force organizations to gracefully it with power. In the agreement, the force organizations shouldn't offer capacity to different players in the aluminum business. In addition, the organization additionally limb interests in two aluminum organizations in Norway. The third class of issues was the mastery the aluminum showcase particularly links and sheets. The offended party contended that the Aluminum Company of America utilized unlawful strategies to infiltrate the control the market for created aluminum items. This was done in three fundamental manners that remembered purchasing numerous offers for the Aluminum Manufacturers and Inc., Aluminum Castings Company, utilizing value press and through the Piston Patent Pool. Ã The third legitimate issue for the situation was whether The Aluminum Company of America along with its auxiliaries were in an illicit scheme, and whether the organization was additionally in tricks with other remote aluminum makers. The Aluminum Company of America was joined in 1928 with the point of accompanying auxiliaries to assume control over the activities of the organization abroad. Instead of the considerable number of assets passed on, the organization gave all its basic offers top its regular investors in the proportion of one offer for each three held. This strategy was intended to guarantee that the valuable responsibility for organization stayed as it had been already. The court expected to decide if these activities were lawful business systems or were intrigues planned for hoarding the aluminum showcase in the United States and abroad (Wang, 73). Ã The last lawful issue for the situation was setting up the correct cure on account of each respondent who might be seen as liable of disregarding the Sherman Act. Around five years had gone since the procedures begun and numerous progressions had occurred in the aluminum business in America. In view of this, it was difficult for the court to arrange the case based on the current legal record. As indicated by the introductions made by the offended party, the court should break down the litigant. Synopsis of any financial investigation pertinent to the case Ã The principal monetary investigation applicable to this case is the ascent of imposing business model and the impacts it has on a countryÃ¢â¬â¢s economy. As noted before in the paper, The Aluminum Company of America actualized various estimates that saw it ascend into a predominant player in the aluminum business. Imposing business models are not unlawful but rather they should be built up through legitimate and serious ways. All the more explicitly, syndications ought not emerge from a companyÃ¢â¬â¢s intensity yet not from intrigues and other unlawful acts (Hall, 28). No organization ought to appreciate the unchallenged monetary force in any industry since it debilitates financial development and eases back financial development. Regardless of whether imposing business models are accomplished legitimately, they ought to be disheartened paying little heed to their monetary outcomes. This would be inline with the Sherman demonstration that was chiefly planned for stopping cong lomerations of capital since it made people vulnerable. Additionally, it allowed enormous associations a chance to abuse clients. The result of the case Ã The case was heard by two distinct courts. At first, the case was dealt with by the area court under the steady gaze of moving to the court of requests. In the locale court, the appointed authority decides that the respondent was not liable of participating in a trick with its auxiliaries to control the American aluminum industry through an imposing business model. The appointed authority noticed that the organization achievement and predominance delighted in by The Aluminum Company of America was an aftereffect of its boss business methodologies contrasted with its rivals. In light of this, the court decided that the activities of the organization violated the Sherman Act (Hand et al, 25). The offended party was not happy with this judgment and requested it. At first, the case was to be heard in the Supreme Court however was moved to the court of claims after the Supreme Court neglected to raise enough number of judges to hear it out. Ã After tuning in to all the entries introduced before it, the
Saturday, August 22, 2020
Numerous schools of history start the tale of rap music as a change of southern cleanser box blues. Utilizing the essentials of the blues style of music, rap is about feelings and the individual understanding of reality by the creator of the melody. Rap, at that point, ought to be considered as a definition paper of sort. What is rap? Rap music is an American minority craftsman creation. Sadly, rap music isn't seen by numerous Americans as a work of art, however as a trend which they expectation will before long blur away, one can follow the historical backdrop of rap back toward the West African expert artists/narrators known as Griots. Rap is verbally expressed word, rap is slang from the traffic intersections of your cerebrum. Rap is smoking herb, rappers recount honest social bombs, ministers even rap it just turns out in a strict structure. Rap is the substance of residents in the tall virus dividers of property. Rap is the narrative of when individuals lost all control. Rap is local, distinct, and ethnic. Rap is territorial, much like tongues. Various pieces of the country live in various habits. Each territorial has its own story to tell, so in rap a tune should recount to the tale of its area. At whatever point a gathering of individuals is bolted inside the edges of American social talk, that network may think that its important to shout or serenade or rap to be heard. It should not shock anyone, at that point, that distance serves to be the mode for counter-social developments. Dissatisfaction is just the start. Every district ought to have its on flare, its on character. Veritable rap educates its audience members about the present social atmosphere. For instance, if the chairman of a city has as of late been sentenced for abusing open assets, it would without a doubt be in a rap tune. In the event that a person went into a court and shot the appointed authority, bailiff, and the court columnist it would doubtlessly be in a rap tune. Not at all like the vast majority of the verses out available today, certifiable rap contains significance and it makes an impression on the audience members. In spite of the fact that those messages may have awful words, and show pictures of things that are socially off-base, thatÃ¢â¬â¢s really what is happening where they are from. Their music speaks to their region and their kin, and it is the same as a rancher singing about his dairy animals and chickens out in farmland.
School Essay Tips Composing an article is basic with these school paper tips. On the off chance that you take as much time as necessary and use the school paper tips, the conceivable outcomes are huge for making that great exposition that catches everyoneÃ¢â¬â¢s eye. School paper tip #1-Come up with a point of convergence or a proposal. In the event that you donÃ¢â¬â¢t do this, at that point you risk having a paper that strays from thought to thought with no heading. In the event that this happens you will lose perusers. School Essay Tip #2 - Coming up with realities and guides to demonstrate your theory is another of those significant school exposition tips. Much the same as recorded as a hard copy a story, attempt to demonstrate this theory in type of a story. DonÃ¢â¬â¢t simply state intense realities and models; show the peruser by recounting to a story that paves the way to your point of convergence. School Essay Tip #3 Ã¢â¬ Making your presentation the most significant piece of your article. In the event that the start of your paper moves gradually and reluctantly the chance of losing your peruser is solid. You have to invest energy at the outset and utilize each school paper tips you can consider to catch the readerÃ¢â¬â¢s eye and make them need to continue perusing. School Essay Tip #4 - Be as unique as conceivable in your composition. The school educators have seen such a significant number of similar subjects throughout the years. You can make yours stand apart basically by using exploratory writing. Make it intriguing with the goal that the peruser doesnÃ¢â¬â¢t need to put it down. School Essay Tip #5 Ã¢â¬ Create pictures in your readerÃ¢â¬â¢s minds through your words. Attempt to compose by speaking to the readerÃ¢â¬â¢s faculties. By utilizing symbolism in words, you can catch anyoneÃ¢â¬â¢s consideration in light of the fact that youÃ¢â¬â¢ll be making a film in their minds. Keep in mind, school educators have devoted their lives to their subjects, and they are immensely left when their understudies show intrigue. School Essay Tip #6 Ã¢â¬ Use succinct words to demonstrate your point instead of causing immense long sentences with words that the perusers to need to search up for their implications. Perusers will in general stay with what they are perusing right to the end when the words stream together without any problem. In the event that they need to stop and re-read a sentence or attempt to make sense of the importance of a word time and again, theyÃ¢â¬â¢ll likely put your composition down sooner or later out of weariness. School Essay Tip #7 Ã¢â¬ Proofread your article before accommodation. Try not to depend on your PC to confirmation your record for you in such a case that youÃ¢â¬â¢ve incorrectly spelled a word so that it peruses like another word, the PC will remember it as a word and not right it. One case of this would be structure and from. Both are real words in the English word reference yet they have totally various employments. Recite your original copy so anyone can hear to yourself or ideally another person. Along these lines, in the event that you feel yourself getting to a cumbersome spot where it doesnÃ¢â¬â¢t stream, youÃ¢â¬â¢ll realize that a change is required. By using a portion of the essential school exposition tips, youÃ¢â¬â¢ll have the option to compose a fruitful piece that will have perusers perusing for additional. This is particularly evident when you can get an educator to peruse with enthusiasm considering they read expositions all through their professions. School article tips can be incredibly helpful information that can bring an understudy through their school years and onto their business lives.
Friday, August 21, 2020
Michael Luther King Jar. Became Martin Luther King Jar. Martin Jar. We will compose a custom article test on Martin Luther King Short Bio or then again any comparable point just for you Request Now Was so anxious to discover that he attempted to go to class when he was five years of age. He was too youthful to even think about going to class that year. Martin Jar. Went to initially review when he was six years of age. Martin Jar. Played with his sister, Christine, and his sibling, Alfred Daniel. Imposing business model, Chinese checkers and marbles were Martin Jar. Ã¢â¬Ës most loved indoor games. He likewise played the piano, violin and he sang. Outside, Martin Jar. Rode his bicycle, football, baseball, flew kites, and fabricated a tree house with his sibling Alfred. Martin likewise preferred to pull pranks on individuals. At some point, he slackened the leg on a Plano seat. At the point when his Plano instructor plunked down, he collided with the floor. Martin Jar. Had a terrible encounter when he was six. He and his companions regularly messed around in his enormous terrace. At some point, Martin Jar. Requested that two white companions play with him , however their mom disclosed to Martin Jar. That her young men would never play with him again. Martin Jar. Was so disturbed. His folks clarified about the laws isolating African Americans and white individuals. African American youngsters couldnÃ¢â¬â¢t go to indistinguishable schools from white individuals. They couldnÃ¢â¬â¢t share water fountains or bathrooms with white individuals. On the off chance that an African American jumped on a transport needed to surrender their seat for a white individual. Despite the fact that the laws weren't right, MartinÃ¢â¬â¢s Jar. Mother disclosed to her child to consistently recollect that he was someone. Thirteen! At the point when he was in the eleventh grade, Martin Jar. Composed an extraordinary discourse and won a prize. He was eager to the point that his Ã¢â¬Å"big wordsÃ¢â¬ had satisfied individuals. On the transport ride home, notwithstanding, Martin Jar. Was advised to surrender his seat to a white man. Martin stated, Ã¢â¬Å"It was the angriest I have ever been a major part of my life. Ã¢â¬ Martin Jar. Skirted the twelfth grade and went to Morehouse College in Atlanta. He attempted to choose how he could best decorating Americans. He addressed whether he ought to be a specialist, a legal counselor or a Minister? Martin Jar. Chosen to turn into a Minister like his dad. Martin Jars. First lesson was in a little room at Benzene Baptist Church. He talked so capably that numerous individuals packed into the space to hear him. An ever increasing number of individuals came tap hear him and after a short time he was lecturing in a bigger room with the goal that more individuals could her his rousing messages. Martin Jar. Come back to College again and earned a doctorate in philosophy. He was presently Dry. Martin Luther King Jar. He met a young lady called Correct Scott at the College where he earned his doctorate and in 1953 Martin Jar. D Correct Scott got hitched. Martin Jar. What's more, his significant other moved to Montgomery, Alabama. There he took a stab at being a decent Minister and network pioneer. On December 1, 1955, an African American lady, named Rosa Park, would not surrender her seat on a transport to o white man. She was captured and brought to Prison for overstepping the law that necessary African Americans to surrender their transport seats to white Americans. Her capture infuriated numerous African Americans in Montgomery, Alabama. They wouldn't ride on the transports until the law was changed. Dry. Martin Luther King Jar. Consented to lead the transport blacklist. He and his family were gladdened and their house was bombarded however he realized that what they were doing was correct. In the end the U. S. Preeminent Court was approached to settle on whether the transport isolation law was acceptable. The Court concluded that the blacklist wasn't right. Dry. Lord and his individual boycotter had won. Dry. Lord drove more fights to end uncalled for laws in the United States. He attempted to guarantee that all kids could go to schools together. He attempted to change laws so African Americans could cast a ballot in races and be paid a similar pay as white individuals. Now and again Dry. Lord was Jailed on the grounds that he went to bat for what he knew was correct. On the 28th of August 1963 Dry. Ruler gave a renowned discourse entitled Ã¢â¬Å"l Have A DreamÃ¢â¬ . A great many individuals heard him state Ã¢â¬Å"l have a fantasy that my four youngsters will one day of their characterÃ¢â¬ . In 1964 Dry. Lord got the Nobel Peace Prize for his peaceful endeavors to change the out of line laws in the United States of America. On April fourth 1968 Dry. Ruler was grievously shot and slaughtered in Memphis, Tennessee, finishing his fantasy of equivalent rights for all Americans. Individuals around the globe were disheartened by the demise of this tranquil pioneer who gave his life to improve the world a spot for all. Step by step instructions to refer to Martin Luther King Short Bio, Papers
Tuesday, August 4, 2020
Hello, Ma Sheng Li Gong Three summers ago, I visited MIT with one of my fellow schoolmates. We were en route to Mathcamp 2004 (which was held in Colby College, ME), and we decided to stay in Boston for a couple of nights before heading up north. Interestingly enough, the family friend that we were staying with knew a grad student from MIT and asked us whether we would like to stay over for a night at the Institute. Having heard so many amazing tales about what MIT contained, we cheerfully agreed. I still remember tossing around a Frisbee in front of Killian Court at dusk. I still remember the maze of corridors and first hearing about the Infinite. And, of course, I still remember the chirping crosswalk in front of 77 Mass Ave. Fast forward to 2007. I am standing underneath the shadow of the colossal marble columns, no longer holding a tourists guide to Boston, but rather, a thick stack of 18.02 course notes. I have learned that the big domey place with the Established for the Advancement ofetc. etc. is called Lobby 7. And, of course, I have learned why the Infinite Corridor is called the Infinite (just run from New House to 26-152, the Physics Room, when you are already late for class. Youll figure out what I mean somewhere along the middle of your journey). So this will be my home for the next four years. (Along with my Mathcamp schoolmate from 3 years ago, Jeremy L. 10). Anyways, that was a big introduction to nothing in particular, but sometimes I still pause and think, Wow, Im at MIT. The MIT. Sounds silly, but if you know where Im coming from, you might understand. I guess I am categorized as an ABC, but Im not your typical ABC. For one thing, I have never gone to school in the US, even though I was born here. My parents moved back to Taiwan when I was still a toddler, and so I spent my entire childhood (and all of my teenage years so yes, my entire life) in that lovely island in Asia. Having no idea of my citizenship, I grew up speaking Mandarin and Taiwanese and attending Taiwanese schools. When my parents decided to transfer me to an international school in third grade, I was depressed for weeks. However, I started learning English, and now ten years later I cant imagine how I would have turned out, if I stayed in the Taiwanese system. Despite going to an international school (e.g. taking AP courses, having classes in English, freaking out about SAT 2s), I guess I never felt like I was actually going to America. College was always in that place across the ocean and who cares about the future, as long as I get yummy sticky rice and REAL bubble tea everyday? So it really hit me when I logged on to the MIT notification system (prefrosh: prepare for the most melodramatic moment of your life) and read the admission letter. I finally felt like, Wow, so I am leaving this place, I am going to America. So thats me, in a nutshell, before coming to the US. I post a lot of comments (which are somewhat helpful, I hope) on College Confidential. Im known as Oasis there, so you might have noticed that Ive been commenting on the MIT blogs as Oasis. Dont ask me why I picked that screen name I dont really know myself (no, it doesnt have to do with the band though I did start listening to them after people commented on my username!). However, I do have a lot of posts on CC (read: too much free time in high school). All of this goes to say that 1) Im unfortunately addicted to that website (but I managed to stay off it for a month!) and 2) I like giving advice in general especially if Ive been through something and theres no need for you to repeat the same mistakes that Ive made. I probably would not know too much about the strategies of Halo 3 or whether USC will win this year in football, but feel free to ask me questions. Ill do my best to respond. :) I still do not know exactly what course Im going to be at MIT but I know Im going to go in the Chemistry, Biology, or Biological Engineering direction (in other words, Courses 5, 7, or 20). I love to travel so I also hope to tie in that interest through the things that were going to be doing in iHouse (more on this soon!) and D-lab (first semester next year). It should be an amazing journey. Mm-hmm. That was a lot of text, and I definitely hope I did not succeed in boring you to death with my ruminations therefore, Ill let some pictures tell you the story of my first couple of weeks at MIT: Fraternity Rush Fraternity Rush is basically the last weekend before the start of school (yes, these pictures are oldI know) and a couple of days into the new school year. Froshies get taken around to all of MITs fraternities (theres 27 of them! and 5 sororities) and they basically enjoy a ton of free food (mmm includes the traditional free lobster and steak dinners) and if you get to know some fraternities to a greater detail off campus trips (I went on a kayaking trip, a beach trip, and a Boston food tour this year!). Twas fun. :) Career Fair One of the amazing things about MIT is the scope of its connections with the major companies and corporations from all the world yes, we are talking about companies like Microsoft, Google, Morgan Stanley, IBM, Sun Microsystems, Limewire, Hewlett Packard, Intel, Xeroxyou name it, MIT has it its really not an understatement to say that these companies recruit straight out of MIT (in fact, thats what a lot of them do through Career Fair). In short, Career Fair is an annual massive conglomeration of company representatives who are interested in recruiting MIT students to work for them. A lot of students (juniors and seniors) submit their resumes and get all dressed up for the affairwhile others, like HaoQi 11 in the picture, go and collect check out all the cool gadgets. I actually missed out on this years career fair (because I was being a good student, and went to classahem) but its alright, theres always next year. =p iHouse retreat! Like I mentioned before, iHouse is my dorm. I dont want to go into too much detail here because you will surely hear a lot from me about iHouse in the entries to come, but iHouse is the newest (were the inaugural year!) living and learning community within MIT. So what exactly is a living and learning community? Is it after-hours school within the dorm (eww)? Basically, we all would have opportunities over the four years to conduct international development projects (very similar to the ones under operation in D-lab), under the guidance of Amy Smith (D-lab instructor, also the lady above talking about Honduran chlorination systems) and the Public Service Center (which also maintains blogs on MIT Admissions!). But most of all, we get to work with one another, toss around ideas, and just share our visions while still living under the same rooftop! And, finally Food, glorious food! Be warned in the time to come, I will probably be blogging a fair amount about food, since I love to eat (dont worry, it will not dominate my blog, I promise :)). I can save money on everything else, but I will not save money on food. I actually bought the Zagat Survey Guidebook for Boston and fully intend to work my way through the majority of it over the four years that I have here (it would be my personal 101 Things to Eat Before I Graduate!) Hey, we all live 60-70-80 years on this earth, so why not make the most of what you eat before you get old and cannot eat as heartily as you can now? Carpe diem, bon appetit! Post Tagged #iHouse #New House
Thursday, June 25, 2020
Dividend policy and the factors behind its determination are considered to be a widely tackled topic in the world of modern finance given the indefinite theories supporting its crucial impact on the firms value and hence arousing great controversy. Most of the research implemented tackled developed markets as opposed to emerging markets which are believed to add a lot to the debate that deeply roots to the seventies given the different nature and lack of efficiency that emerging markets possess and hence adds to the attractiveness of the debate. This paper will mainly cover the key determinates to the dividend policy and how these determinants impact its formation in the most tradable listed companies in the Egyptian stock market over a period of five years 2006-2011 in the first research done by the author. This paper is structured as follows: Chapter 2 deals with literature review tapping on its theoretical and historical background. Chapter 3 deeply covers methodology, research question, objectives, and hypothesis analysis. Chapter 4 Data Analysis, Results and recommendations. Keywords: Dividend Policy, Dividend theories, Ownership Structure (Capital Structure), Cash Flow, leverage, Taxes, Sector, Profitability. Literature Review Theoretical background There are various researches and studies which examine a number of theories related to determinant of dividend policy. The main objectives of these theories and studies were to examine and find correlation between firm characteristics and dividend policy. Companies pays dividend when it has sufficient internal sources of funding, if companies reduce dividend payout the company owners may become worried about the company performance , since they consider it as a signal of company poor performance and low profits which leads to decline in stock price. According to the outcome model, dividends are paid because minority shareholders pressure corporate insiders to pay cash, while as per the Substitute model, insiders interested in issuing equity. In general, higher dividends payouts lead to lower Retained Earnings and Capital Gain and vice versa, leaving total wealth of shareholders unchanged. In certain countries, shareholders are taxed more heavily on dividends receipts th an on capital gain. Firms can signal future profitability through paying dividends. Firms that initiate dividends, experience share price increases, and vice versa. Recently an idea has been focused on, implementing that dividends policies address agency problems between corporate insiders and outside shareholders. This theory implies that unless profits are paid, it might be diverted by the insiders for personal use, or which may result in commitment to unprofitable projects with benefits to those insiders. Dividend Theoretical back ground. Agency Theory. Insiders, who control corporate assets, can use these assets for purposes that are detrimental to the interest of outside investors. They also can use corporate assets to pursue investment strategies that yield them personal benefits of control. Through dividends, insiders return corporate earnings to investors and wont be able to using such earnings to benefit themselves. This is because managers who possess cash would like to reinvest in projects that will yield them personal benefits Also paying dividends exposes companies to the possible need to come to the capital markets in the future to raise external funds. Paying dividends result in lesser cash flow available in the hands of insiders (managers), which mitigate their ability to spend on projects which benefit their own interest. Dividends could serve as a tool to reduce or eliminate agency cost, in addition companies will pay lower dividend when manager holds equity in the company. If mangers hold a position in the company equity it will defiantly affect the dividend policy. Chen Steiner (1999). , Al-Najjar and Hussainey2009. Agency cost might be reduced if insiders boost their share in the company by making the managers the eventual owners of company, yet this ultimate ownership by management will lead to a conflict of interest between the management and outsiders since the insiders will try to retain more cash under their management either by decreasing payment of dividends or by continuously paying out dividends at a at low level bearing in mind the tax consideration above in developed markets (Jensen and Meckling 1976). Directors manage the companies through a contract between the shareholders and managers, in which the mangers have power and authority to manage the company in order to maximize shareholders wealth in return of a specific benefit. Jensen and Meckling (1976). If inside managers increase their common stock-ownership in the company, they will be keen on aligning th eir interest with shareholders interests; this will result in reducing equity agency cost. The higher common stocks held by managers, the more likely such owner-managers act in the interests of Shareholders and work on optimizing the companys value. Thus, a higher level of insider ownership will lead to lower agency problems and reduces the role of dividends as a monitoring tool to control for agency cost Controlling shareholders can effectively determine the decisions of the managers, and can implement policies that benefit themselves at the expense of the minority shareholders The main target of Corporate Governance is mainly reaching a compromise between the company management and the shareholders,( Jiraporn et al. (2008). If the company has a strong a well-established corporate governance regulations investors will be paid high dividend, both are positively correlated .Michaely and Roberts (2006) . Kowalewski et al. (2007). Companies with qualified and quality corporate governance team are more capable of controlling Agency cost and reducing them, thus paying more and higher dividends. Investors would prefer to maintain the companys debt ratio to the lowest level possible, out of belief that it will results in more dividends to them and thus it will reduce cash available to managers (Jensen 2009a , Meckling 1976). Also paying dividends exposes companies to the possible need to come to the capital markets in the future to raise external funds. Since payment of dividends prevents management from continuing to invest in bad projects, we should expect earnings and profitability to increase. However if the board decides on dividends, before management has a chance to overinvest, then it is difficult to predict and assess how future earnings will be relative and compared to past earnings Paying dividends result in lesser cash flow available in the hands of insiders (managers), which mitigate their ability to spend on projects which ben efit their own interest. If inside managers increase their common stock-ownership in the company, they will be keen on aligning their interest with shareholders interests; this will result in reducing equity agency cost. The higher common stocks held by managers, the more likely such owner-managers act in the interests of Shareholders and work on optimizing the companys value. Thus, a higher level of insider ownership will lead to lower agency problems and reduces the role of dividends as a monitoring tool to control for agency cost. Shareholders can utilize their legal powers in voting for Directors who offer better dividends policies, or by suing companies that spend too lavishly on activities that benefit only insiders. Good investor protection makes asset diversion legally riskier and more expensive for insiders. The greater the rights of the minority shareholders, the more the cash they can extract form the firm, other things equal. In the high protection countries shareh olders are able to extract dividends from companies by their ability to resist oppression rather than having any specific dividends rights. Generally, Shareholders, who feel protected, would accept low dividends, and high The investment policy of the firm cannot be taken as independent of its dividends policy, thus paying dividends may reduce the inefficiency of marginal investment. Also the allocation of profits to shareholders on pro rata basis cannot be taken for granted Firms in common law countries, where investors protection is better, make higher dividends than firm in civil law countries. Also, in common law countries, high growth firms make lower dividends than low growth countries.- Corporate and other laws grant outside investors, including shareholders, certain powers to protect their investment against expropriation by insiders. Power such as equality in receiving the same per share dividends as insiders, to the power to vote on important corporate matters. Common law countries appear to have better legal protection of minority shareholders, than civil law countries. Such better protection contributes to the efficiency of resource allocation and to economic growth. Reinvestment rates, from a company with good opportunities, as they know that when these investments pay off, they could extract high dividends. In contrast, if protection is poor, shareholders will try to get what they can. A firm must establish a reputation for moderation in expropriating shareholders, in order to have the chance and competences to raise funds from external resources at low cost and approach capital markets for funds. In countries with stronger shareholder protection, the need for reputational mechanism is weaker, and hence the need to pay dividends. Other things equal, dividends payout ratios should be higher in countries with weak legal protection than in those with strong protection. Firms with better growth prospects have a stronger incentive to establish a reputation. As they have need to raise fund from external resources. Thus firms with better growth prospects may choose higher dividends payout ratios than firms with poor growth prospects. The relationship between growth prospects and dividend payout is ambiguous, as in contrast to the above; firms with good growth prospects have a better use of funds than the ones with poor growth. In common law countries, payout ratios are strictly higher for slowly growing firms than rapidly growing ones. Results are consistent with the predications of the outcome of the Agency model, according to which well protected minority investors are happy with low dividend payout firms with good growth prospects In Civil law countries, in contrast, rapidly growing firms appear to pay higher dividends. On all measures of dividends payouts, countries with better shareholder protection have higher dividends payout ratios than do countries with worse protection. Within countries with good shareholder protection, high growth firms have lower dividends payout than low growth firms. Within countries with low shareholder protection, high growth firms have higher dividends payout than low growth firms. Agency approach is highly relevant to an understanding of corporate dividends policies. Signaling theory Firms with high future earnings and rewards would prefer announcing and signaling that to investors and outside parties in the market, while firms with low cash flow expectation will not declare or be able to do the same, as managers are not supposed to send wrong signals to the market. Investors can assume information about firms future earnings through the signal coming from dividend announcements, both in terms of the stability of, and changes in, dividends. The signaling hypothesis argues that special dividends provide a signal to investors of the firms improving potential earnings; Signaling theory could be tested through the company future increase in earnings.( Watts (1973).) Managers use special dividends to signal future operating performance for firms with high growth opportunities, and use special dividends to reduce agency costs for firms with low growth opportunities. The market reacts more strongly to the disbursement of excess cash flow by firms with low gro wth opportunities than it does to the announcement of a special dividend as a signal by firms with high growth opportunities. Also, the market reacts moderately to the special dividend announcement of a firm with higher growth opportunities and higher preannouncement cash flow, whereas the reaction is insignificant for firms with higher growth. Usually the stock market reacts positively to dividend announcement, when companies announce paying dividends the stock price moves up, we can say that there is a positive relation. Stock price react positively to any increase or special dividends, which enhance the signaling hypothesis, also it serve as an evident to the fact that mangers will be willing to pay dividend if they have faith in the company future earnings that it will steadily increase and grow, dividend also serve as a signal to future cash flow of the company, which reflect stability in future earning and positive cash flow vis versa. Lintner(1956). Lipson Maquieira and Megginson (1998) ( Kale Noe (1990). As managers are likely to have more information about the firms future prospects than outside investors, they may be able to use changes in dividends as a vehicle to communicate information to the financial market about a firms future earnings and growth. Outside Investors may perceive dividends as a reflection of the managers assessment of a firms performance and prospects. However, managers should possess private information about the firms prospects, and have incentives to convey such information to the market. Based on that, a signal should be true, that is, a firm with poor future prospects should not send false signals to the market by increasing dividends payments. Thus the market should be able to rely on the signal to differentiate among firms. If these conditions are fulfilled, the market should be able to react favorably to the announcements of dividends increase and unfavorably otherwise. (Al-Najjar and Hussainey 2009b). Div idend payout is an indication of the company historical healthy performance however future earnings could be negative, which means that company current positive performance could not be an indication of future performance. We can notice companies paying good dividends and in the coming years it could be in a financial squeeze and are not able to pay any dividend. (Benartzi et al. 1997). Companies with strong corporate governance will prefer to announce low dividend payout, in case there is potential future investment opportunities, on the contrary companies with poor corporate governance will prefer to announce high dividend payout since it acts as a signal that the company management is doing a good job for the shareholder interest. (.Aharony and Swary, 1980 ) . Pecking order Theory Companies will initially seek Retained Earnings to finance announced dividends, and then seek debt to borrow, if Retained Earnings are insufficient, instead of issuing new shares. Companies usually prefer internal funding on external one .Mayers (1984), and Myers and Majluf (1984). Financing comes from three sources: internal funds, debt and new equity, Companies prioritize their sources of income, first priority to Internal Financing, debt, and then finally raising of equity is the last resort. Raising capital through equity is not usually preferred means; since shareholders sometimes thought that managers believes that the company is overvalued they are trying to benefit from this mispricing, at that point investor will not be willing to place high value for the new issue. The issue of equity would signal lack of confidence in the board and that the stock price is overvalued. Thus such issue can lead to a drop in share price if stock price is overvalued, the issue of equity would be favored. Myers (1984) From the point of view of an outside Investor, Equity is more risky than outside Debt, as it will demand higher rate of return on Equity than on Debt, however from the prospective of those inside the company, Retained Earnings are better source of income than Debt, and debt is a better deal than equity finance. This theory maintains that business usually adhere to a certain hierarchy of financing sources and prefer internal financing, if available, and then will prefer debt over equity for external financing. New Equity means issuing shares, which results in bringing external ownership into the company. The issue of debt signals the boards confidence and trust that an investment is profitable and that the current stock price is undervalued. The companies will adhere to pecking order theory to finance its operations (Al-Najjar Hussauney, 2009b). As equity markets become larger and more liquid, dependence on marginal debt financing drops sig nificantly. In the presence of both debt and equity markets, the relative importance of debt (as captured by aggregate debt to equity ratio) appears to fall as economies grow. Transaction cost Theory Companies that enjoy low transaction costs of equity or debt issuance may be more willing to pay dividends than firms that have high transaction costs. A company will be willing to pay dividends when its internally generated funds are not completely utilized for investment purposes, and when it experiences low growth. Rozeff (1982). Larger companies possess the privilege of smaller transaction (issuing cost) because of economies of Scale. Companies size plays an important role in the dividend pay-out ratio. Larger companies have easier access to the capital market, which reduces their dependence on internally generated funding and allows for higher pay-out ratios Companies that have a low transaction cost of equity or debt issuance may be more willing to distribute cash dividends more than companies with high transaction cost. Firms that have low transaction costs of equity or debt issuance may be more inclined to distribute cash dividends than firms that have high transac tion costs. The more paid dividends the lower will be the agency cost incurred. However, the more paid dividends will lead to an increase in the transaction cost. If Shareholders seek a steady flow of income from their capital investment, then dividend payments would be the cheapest way to achieve such goal. The companies size will be an important determinant of the dividend policy, since the small companies would mainly rely on debts to finance their activities and payment of dividends, thus such small companies will face higher transactions cost than larger ones. If dividend payments will minimize transaction costs shareholders, then positive dividends payout would be optimal. There is an argument that, despite the fact that Transactions cost has dramatically been reduced, such reduction should have resulted in lower demand in dividends, as the alternative options have been reduced, but there is no apparent evidence of a shift or reduction in dividends payment which is related to such change in transaction cost. Such argument specifically applies to small investors who do not hold many shares, thus the cost of transaction will be higher. Bird in hand Theory The bird-in-the-hand may sound familiar as it is taken from an old saying: a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. In this theory the bird in the hand is referring to dividends and the bush is referring to capital gains. Dividend, as a general rule, increase firms value, Shareholders have preference for cash than future capital gain on which stocks to build a position in. Thus a divided payment is associated with increasing firms value investors prefer higher dividend which reduces uncertainty about future cash flows. A high payout ratio will reduce the cost of capital and thus increase share value (Gordon and Lintner, 1962). If company will increase its dividend payout ratio, shareholders became concerned about the firm future capital gain, since the retained earning will be negatively affect , this also could hinders management from potential future investment opportunities which could increase in future earnings One of the leading theories back then was the bird in hand theory and explicitly stating that investors prefer dividends as opposed to retained earnings as they viewed dividends to offer more certainty than retained earning which came second in terms of certainty and inevitability Current dividends are relatively more certain than future capital returns. Shareholders are risk averse and prefer to receive dividends in the present than to future capital gains (Gordon, 1962, Miller and Modiglianis 1961). Shareholders are not entitled to fixed returns. Current dividends are relatively more certain than future capital returns. Shareholders are risk averse and prefer to receive dividends in the present than to future capital gains. Investors values each dollar paid as a dividend four times as opposed to each dollar kept on as retained earnings; also it has greater and more positive effect on share performance. (Diamond, 1967 ). Literature Review. Share price and perfect market. Dividend policy has been a fertile topic of discussion since Miller and Modigliani (1961) imposed that dividends are irrelevant and have hardly any influence on a firms share price in the event of having a perfect capital market, a matter that has created great debate. Opposing practitioners to the Miller and Modiglianis theory declined this preposition by stating that a perfect capital market assumption does not exist and introduced competing theories and research to provide pragmatic evidence that dividends matter most in imperfect capital markets which are the case in real world and hence dividends do have an impact on a firms share price. Baker and Wurgler (2004) companies are willing to initiate dividend when the stock prices react positively when deciding initiating dividend. When the market positively reacts with initiating dividend and adds premium to the stocks value. Fama and French (2001), Grullon, Michaely, and Swaminathan (2002), and DeAngelo, DeAngelo, and St ulz (2006)). Explains the life cycle theory for dividend payment, which shows that companies with high retained earnings compared to its total asset will be willing to initiate dividend Taxes. Sighting this debate from a tax preference angle we shall dig deep in the 1970s and 1980s where several research suggested that dividends are more disposed to higher tax cut than capital gains. (Brennan, 1970; Elton and Gruber, 1970; Litzenberger and Ramaswamy, 1979; Litzenberger and Ramaswamy, 1982; Kalay, 1982; John and Williams, 1985; Poterba and Summers, 1984; Miller and Rock, 1985; Ambarish et al., 1987) and that dividends are taxed directly but capital gains will be taxed/realized only when the stocks are sold and hence investors are more prone to keep a companys profit as opposed to distributing a cash dividend for tax related concerns. The benefit behind the tax treatment in capital gains may lead investors to prefer a low dividend payout. However this does not apply to Egypt as of yet since there is no tax charged on neither dividends nor capital gains. But this matter has been proposed for implication especially amid the January 25th revolution a matter that abolish ed economic stability with the government it brought down leading to an increase in the balance of payment deficit. Despite the turbulence arousing, all successive governments who normally disagree on one view came to unite in solving this problem by suggesting the imposition of taxes to both dividends and capital gains in attempts to increase its financial resources. Ownership structure. Among other determinants is the ownership structure where a correlation between ownership structure and dividend performance existed which is normally referred to the Agency problem in (Easterbrook, 1984; Jensen, 1986), which imposes that idea that dividends provide an indirect means of control to the management of a firm. Jensen and Meckling (1976) focused on the issue of Agency Cost Hypothesis and stated that dividend limits the cash under insiders management, therefore leaving them under tough capital market analysis. Jensen and Meckling (1976) argued that agency cost might be reduced if insiders increase their ownership in the firm by making the managers the eventual owners of company yet this ultimate ownership by management will lead to a conflict of interest between the management and outsiders since the insiders will make efforts to collect more cash under their management either by reducing payment of dividends or by continuously paying out dividends at a at low level bear ing in mind the tax consideration above in developed markets. Glen et al. (1995), Gul (1999a), Naser et al. (2004) and Al-Malkawi (2007) point out that in government ownership in emerging markets is major element of the dividend decision-making process. Gul (1999a) proposed a positive relationship between government ownership and dividends, debating that firms with high Government ownership face less hurdles in financing investment projects, and accordingly can afford to pay more dividends. On the contrary, firms with limited or no government ownership face difficulties in raising money, and instead rely on retained earnings for investments by paying small dividends. Legal Protection Text Glen et al. (1995) stated that shareholders in countries with poor legal protection need to be protected. Governments are normally heavy weighted investors and accordingly they should defend minority investors through observing the directors and forcing them to expel cash. Naser et al. (2004) added that in emerging market, there is a poor legal protection for investors; governments plays important role in order to build up a solid firm reputation where there is no abuse of minority shareholders by paying out large dividends. They further stressed building this reputation has substantial on emerging exchanges where the minority shareholders are suffering. Al-Malkawi (2007) communicated that the government plays an important role on behalf of its citizen who do not manage firm. The government was found to be the most the most powerful in influencing the dividend policy especially among large shareholders in firms listed on the Amman Stock Exchange. Accordingly in firms like the one discussed above a conflict might exist that is normally referred to as a double principal-agent conflict. This conflict may happen between citizens and government representatives or managers and government representatives in case the former does not act in the latters best interest. This problem could be solved through the payout of a larger dividend value which shrinks the cash flow available to managers and accordingly minimizing the agency problems of the firm. This explanation concurs with the study carried by Gugler (2003) who examined the dividend policies in Australian firms. Wrapping up the above there is a clear positive correlation between the dividend payout and the government ownership where the percent of shares owned by the government can be an indicator to the companys ownership structure. Free cash Flow. The percent of shares held by various types of shareholders is not being the only determinant of the dividend-agency framework; the free cash flow may also be of great significance. Jensen (1986) defined free cash flow as the cash flow in surplus of the funds essential for all projects with a positive net present value (NPV). He proved that as the increase in free cash flow escalates the agency conflict between the interests between the management and outside shareholders leading to a decrease in the performance of the company. While shareholders require their managers to maximize the value of their shares, the managers may have a conflicting interest and prefer to derive benefits for themselves. Jensens free cash flow hypothesis has been reinforced by studies by Jensen et al. (1992) and Smith and Watts (1992). La Porta et al. (2000) added that when a firm has a free cash flow, its managers will engage in extravagant practices. Various studies have argues that firms with a greater free cash flow need to pay more dividends to lower the agency costs of the free cash flow (Jensen, 1986; Holder et al., 1998; La Porta et al., 2000; and Mollah et al., 2002). Based on the above studies there is a positive relationship between the free cash flow and the dividend payout ratio and hence the dividend payout is positively associated with free cash flow. The Free Cash Flow Hypothesis (imposed by Jensen 1986) stipulated that companies normally focus on finding opportunities in new project to generate income profitability where the focus on dividend payout is less prior and is normally financed off the residual balance. Given this debate, the concept of complete separation between ownership and management is the most alluring to avoid conflict of interest between both parties. A study by Afza and Slahudin, 2009 concluded that the more profitable investment opportunities the less efficiency in the use of cash resources by management. the firms financial competence and liquidity position are considered key determinants of the dividend value. Companies facing liquidity squeeze will be more prone to pay out a stock dividend versus a cash dividend since paying stock dividends will not burden the companys liquidity status. Paying dividends in the form of stocks will lead to the company to increase its number of outstanding shares which directly hits the shareholders value and hence forces the company to strive more to increase its profit by at least the same percentages of increase in its shares to avoid dilution of its EPS. Company Size. The size of a firm plays an integral role on the level of financial constraint the firm is facing and accordingly is considered a key factor in determining the dividend amount paid out by such company. The bigger the firms size the higher value of their assets and hence it is easier for them to obtain funds through external capital markets whether by debt or equity. Large size firms also do not lower the amount the pay out as dividend to finance future profitable projects they are normally able to do both unless in its extremely inevitable for them. Small firms on the contrary, have restricted access to external debt or equity markets try to increase the amount of funds generated internally by growing their retention ratio which lowers the dividend payout ratio in an attempt to increase cash in hand to finance its new projects. Eddy and Seifert (1988), Jensen et al. (1992), Redding (1997), and Fama and French (2000) indicated that large firms allocate a higher amount of their net profits as dividends as opposed to small firms. Numerous studies have verified the influence of firm size on the dividend-agency association. Lloyd et al. (1985) were among the leaders to adjust Rozeffs model by adding firm size as an supplementary variable. They considered it an important descriptive constituent, as large companies are more likely to increase their dividend payouts to lower their agency costs. Their adjustment to the Rozeff model actually supports Jensen and Mecklings (1976) debate that stated that agency costs are connected with firm size. They supported the idea that for large firms the ownership structure has a bargaining control which hence increases agency costs. Adding to this, Sawicki (2005) demonstrated that dividend payments can help to indirectly monitor managers performance in large firms. In large firms, information irregularity surges due to ownership dispersal, shrinking the shareholders capability to control the internal and exter nal activities of the firm. This result in a decreased inefficient control by the management where paying out a large dividend value can be a solution to this problem since it escalates the need for external financing which accordingly leads to more control on these firms from external creditors. Holder et al. (1998) communicated illustrated in a study that a positive relation exists between dividends, firm sizes and transaction costs. The study revealed that larger firms have better access to capital markets and accordingly have easier access to raise funds at low costs which allows a payout of higher dividends. Leverage. The firms capital structure and leverage also affect its dividend decisions. A study by Darling (1957) debated that highly leveraged companies need more cash and liquidity to meet its future payment obligations. Also high leveraged company are normally threaten by liquidity shortage and accordingly are subject to insolvency due to the extended burden on the companys liquidity position and the non-payment of interest which normally reduces the companys cash flows available for dividend payments making having high debt ratio companies pay low dividends (Rozef, 1982) Profitability. On the other hand, companies profitability is an important measure of dividend payout determinant. Lintner (1956) found that companies net profits are important determinant of dividend change and De Angelo Et. Al (1992) claimed that current profit is a critical determinant of dividend decision. This is why managers are unwilling to lower dividend payout ratios unless when earnings are very low; also the more profits generated by a company the more dividends it pays out. Mayers and Frank, 2008 Fama and French (200). In line with Fama and French (2001), we concluded that companies who pays dividend always profitable large companies, on the other hand this relation is not always the case across different countries it could be different. The fact that the ownership of firms isnt diversified or slashed into small group creates the burden of financial tunneling as major shareholders strive to work for the benefit of their big stakes which normally conflicts with the benefit of the firm and smaller shareholders exploiting the financial capabilities for their interest. Research Gap. From the previous studies we found that there isnt any study that analyze or examine determinates of dividend policy of the Egyptian listed companies. Methodology In the last chapter I find that there is a research gap, since there isnt any studies which examine or analyze the determinates of dividend policy of the Egyptian listed companies (most active) Research Questions Accordingly, we can say that our research question is what are the main determinates of dividend policy for the Egyptian listed stocks EGX 100) Research Objectives 3.2.1. Determining theoretical back ground of dividend policy. 3.2.2. Determining the historical back ground of dividend policy. 3.2.3. Scanning literature review regarding determinants of dividend policy 3.2.4. Discover main determinants of dividend policy. 3.2.5. Studying the effect of each determinates of dividend policy. 3.2.6. Studying the relative importance of each determinates of dividend policy. 3.2.7. Directing the other researchers towards the future researched dividend policy. 3.2.8. Studying the effect of each determinates of dividend policy. 3.2.9. Studying the effect of each determinates of dividend policy. Research Model Profitability Leverage Ownership structure Free Cash flow Control Variables Industry. Size Determinants (Independent) Cash Dividend. Dividends (Dependent) Stock Dividend. The Independent Variables: Size: continuous quantitative variable Leverage: Continuous quantitative variable ranges from 0 to 1. Cash flow : Continuous quantitative Variable Profitability: Continuous quantitative variable ranges from 0 to 1. The Industry : Nominal variable contains 29 industry The Ownership Structure: Binary Variables contains 2 categories 0 for the companies which is More than 50% of ownership is Anchor or institutional, and 1 for the companies which is More than 50% of ownership is Retail. The Dependent variables: The cash Dividend. : a continuous variable The Stock Dividend. Binary variable contains 2 categories 0 no stock dividends and 1 yes. Hypotheses 3.4.1. There is a positive relation between the company size dividends paid. 3.4.2. There is a positive relation between the company profitability dividend paid. 3.4.3. There is a negative relation between intuitional ownership dividend paid. 3.4.4. There is a positive relation between retail ownership dividend paid. 3.4.5. There is a positive relation between the company free cash flow and divided paid 3.4.6. There is a negative relation between the company leverage and dividend paid 3.4.7. There is a positive relation between the company size and dividend paid Population and sample In this research paper we gathered data for the most active listed companies, about 100 companies included in the EGX 100ondex. Data Collection Our sample is prepared using data gathered from Bloomberg Mubasher; the sample includes all firms included in the EGX 100 .Bloomberg offers information on total assets, ROE, ROA, Free Cash flow, Leverage, ownership structure for years 2006 till 2011. Research limitation Though this paper was cautiously prepared, I believe that there are some limitations. The number of Egyptian listed stocks is limited. Companies do not report its financials in unified shape Lack of companys historical financials since Egypt is considered as emerging market. Lack of data sources. During the last 5 years a lot of profitable companies were bought by anchor or institutional investors which limits and change the number of active and profitable companies in the study. Data Analysis, Results and recommendations In this section of the research we will examine the hypothesis. As stated previously, this paper used historical data for the stocks include in the EGX 100 and special statistical techniques (multiple-regression) to study the correlation between variables in addition examine hypotheses Descriptive Statistics Table: Descriptive Statistics of The Variables Included in the investigation: N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Size (in what Unit for ex millions) 479 3.8795 94952 6060 14136 LEVERAGE % 376 .0001 735 59.5 91.3 Cash Flow (in what Unit for ex millions) 463 -363 113.80 -2.497 33.9891 Profitability % 427 -127.33 161.9773 16.051 19.789 Cash Dividend (in what Unit for ex millions) 588 .000 310.480 1.07201 12.8896 The means of SIZE, LEVERAGE, CASH FLOW, and CASH DIVIDENDS are 6060, -2.479, 16.051, and 1.07201 respectively. These variables have high variability as measured by standard deviations of 14136, 91.3, 33.99, and 12.89, respectively. But, the mean of the PROPFITABILITY is 16.051, and has low variability, as measured by a standard deviation of 19.789.These higher degrees of variability indicate that there are large differences among companies. Table: Frequency Table f or Stock Dividend variable: Frequency Percent Valid No 508 86.4 Yes 80 13.6 Total 588 100.0 86.4% of the companies dont give stock dividends while only 13.6% do. Table: Frequency Table for ownership variable: Frequency Percent Valid 50% Retail 348 59.2 = 50% Retail 240 40.8 Total 588 100.0 40.8% of the companies with more than 50% Retail ownership while 60% of the companies with more than 50% Anchor or institutional ownership. Table: Frequency Table for industry variable: Industry Frequency Percent Valid Percent Valid 1 42 7.1 7.1 2 30 5.1 5.1 3 18 3.1 3.1 4 30 5.1 5.1 5 138 23.5 23.5 6 54 9.2 9.2 7 12 2.0 2.0 8 6 1.0 1.0 9 6 1.0 1.0 11 6 1.0 1.0 12 30 5.1 5.1 13 12 2.0 2.0 14 30 5.1 5.1 15 12 2.0 2.0 16 18 3.1 3.1 17 12 2.0 2.0 18 24 4.1 4.1 19 36 6.1 6.1 20 6 1.0 1.0 21 6 1.0 1.0 22 6 1.0 1.0 23 6 1.0 1.0 24 6 1.0 1.0 25 6 1.0 1.0 26 6 1.0 1.0 27 6 1.0 1.0 28 12 2.0 2.0 29 6 1.0 1.0 30 6 1.0 1.0 Total 588 100.0 100.0 Correlation First Studding the effect of The Independent Variables on the Cash Dividends: Table: Pearson Coefficient Correlation Matrix: Profitability Cash Flow LEVERAGE Size Cash Dividend Profitability Pearson Correlation 1 .129** .043 .199** .026 Sig. (2-tailed) .009 .422 .000 .586 N 427 407 344 427 427 Cash Flow Pearson Correlation .129** 1 .049 -.097* .014 Sig. (2-tailed) .009 .365 .040 .758 N 407 463 350 443 463 LEVERAGE Pearson Correlation .043 .049 1 .104* .018 Sig. (2-tailed) .422 .365 .043 .732 N 344 350 376 376 376 Size Pearson Correlation .199** -.097* .104* 1 .147** Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .040 .043 .001 N 427 443 376 479 479 Cash Dividend Pearson Correlation .026 .014 .018 .147** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .586 .758 .732 .001 N 427 463 376 479 588 Cash Dividend Vs Profitability: Sinc e P-value =0.586 which is greater than ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±/2 =0.025 so we dont reject Ho: ÃÆ'Ã ÃâÃ =0 i.e. we are 95% confident that there is no significant relationship between Cash Dividend Profitability i.e. they are independent. Cash Dividend Vs Cash flow: Since P-value =0.758 which is greater than ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±/2 =0.025 so we dont reject Ho: ÃÆ'Ã ÃâÃ =0 i.e. we are 95% confident that there is no significant relationship between Cash Dividend Cash flow i.e. they are independent. Cash Dividend Vs leverage: Since P-value =0.732 which is greater than ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±/2 =0.025 so we dont reject Ho: ÃÆ'Ã ÃâÃ =0 i.e. we are 95% confident that there is no significant relationship between Cash Dividend Leverage i.e. they are independent. Cash Dividend Vs Size: Since P-value =0.001 which is less than ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±/2 =0.025 so we reject Ho: ÃÆ'Ã ÃâÃ =0 i.e. we are 95% confident that there is significant linear weak relationship between Cash Dividend Size with ÃÆ'Ã ÃâÃ =0.147 Table : Eta measure for association between Cash Dividend and Industry: Value Nominal by Interval Eta Cash Dividend Dependent .082 Industry Dependent .593 Using Eta Measure it seems there a weak relationship between Cash Dividend and Industry. Table : Cramers V measure for association between Cash Dividend and Industry: Value Approx. Sig. Cramers V .572 .000 Since P-value 0.0005, we reject Ho: Independence I.e. there is an intermediate relationship between Industry and Cash Dividend. From The above Tables we deduce that 2 variables only would be used in the regression model: The Size of the Company. The Industry. To be used in the regression, The Variable of Industry would be reco ded into New 29 variable to have a binary variable represent each sector with value 1 if the company belongs to that sector and 0 otherwise. Regression The Variables Entered to the model: Model Variables Entered 1 Size Table : Goodness of fit Model Adjusted R Square 1 .020 This Model Explains 2% of the variations in Cash dividend variable, i.e its a poor fit model. Table : The Significance of The model: Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F 1 Regression 2112.156 1 2112.156 10.575 Residual 95272.863 477 199.733 Total 97385.019 478 a. Predictors: (Constant), Size b. Dependent Variable: Cash Dividend Since p-value = 0.001 which is less than ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±=0.05 we are 95 % confident that the model is significant. Table : the Significance of the Coefficients: Beta 1 (Constant) .402 Size .147 Since the p-value of the constant Coefficient ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ²o equals 0.568 i.e. More than ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±=0.05 Then we dont reject Ho: ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ²o=0 Since the p-value of the constant Coefficient ÃÆ'Ã ½Ãâ Ã ²1 equals 0.001 i.e. less than ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±=0.05 Then we reject Ho: ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ²1=0 I.e. when the size of the company increases by one unit the cash Dividend would increase by 0.147 units. Table : The Excluded Variables From the model: Model Beta In t Sig. Partial Correlation Co linearity Statistics Tolerance 1 Ownership structure -.047a -1.034 .302 -.047 .995 sec2 -.003a -.073 .942 -.003 .995 sec3 -.006a -.126 .900 -.006 .997 sec4 .008a .174 .862 .008 .994 sec5 .077a 1.714 .087 .078 .999 sec6 .014a .307 .759 .014 .986 sec7 .005a .104 .917 .005 .999 sec8 -.002a -.037 .970 -.002 .999 sec9 -.003a -.070 .944 -.003 .999 sec11 -.008a -.186 .852 -.009 1.000 sec12 -.095a -1.899 .058 -.087 .819 sec13 -.002a -.045 .964 -.002 .996 sec14 -.023a -.498 .619 -.023 .997 sec15 -.006a -.143 .886 -.007 .998 sec16 -.011a -.244 .807 -.011 .999 sec17 -.004a -.087 .931 -.004 .997 sec18 -.033a -.670 .503 -.031 .851 sec19 -.003a -.058 .954 -.003 .991 sec20 -.018a -.403 .687 -.018 .991 sec21 -.008a -.168 .867 -.008 1.000 sec22 .004a .093 .926 .004 .998 sec23 -.003a -.057 .955 -.003 .998 sec24 -.006a -.133 .894 -.006 .999 sec25 .003a .076 .940 .003 .998 sec26 .004a .090 .929 .004 1.000 sec27 -.002a -.050 .960 -.002 .999 sec28 -.004a -.083 .934 -.004 .997 sec29 -.003a -.065 .949 -.003 .998 sec30 -.002a -.033 .973 -.002 .998 Since P-value of All the variables in the above table is more than ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±= 0.05 So all t he coefficients are insignificant so all this variable have no significant effect on the Cash dividend so they are excluded from the model b. Dependent Variable: Cash Dividend The prediction Model: (Expected Cash Dividends)= (0.147) (Size) SECOND: Studding the Effect of The independent variables on the Stock Dividend: Table : Comparing Means of Profitability between Companies give Stock Dividends and Companies dont: Levenes Test for Equality of Variances F Sig. Profitability Equal variances assumed 4.040 .045 Equal variances not assumed Since P-value of Levenes test =0.045 which is ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±/2 =0.025 then we dont reject Ho i.e. we assume equal variances Since P-value =0.797 which is ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±/2 =0.025 then we dont reject Ho: My=Mn i.e. we are 95% confident that there is no significant difference in profitability between The Companies that give Stock Dividends and the Companies that dont give on average. I.e. profitability and stock dividend are independent. Table : Comparing Means of leverage between Companies give Stock Dividends and Companies dont: Levenes Test for Equality of Variances F Sig. LEVERAGE Equal variances assumed 1.321 .251 Equal variances not assumed Since P-value of Levenes test =0.251 which i s ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±/2 =0.025 then we dont reject Ho i.e. we assume equal variances Since P-value =0.322 which is ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±/2 =0.025 then we dont reject Ho: My=Mn i.e. we are 95% confident that there is no significant difference in leverage between The Companies that give Stock Dividends and the Companies that dont give on average. I.e. leverage and stock dividend are independent. Table : Comparing Means of Cash flows between Companies give Stock Dividends and Companies dont: Levenes Test for Equality of Variances F Sig. Cash Flow Equal variances assumed .282 .596 Equal variances not assumed Since P-value of Levenes test = 0.596 which is ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±/2 =0.025 then we dont reject Ho i.e. we assume equal variances Since P-value =0.759 which is ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±/2 =0.025 then we dont reject Ho: My=Mn i.e. we are 95% confident that there is no significant difference in Cash flows between The Companies that give Stock Div idends and the Companies that dont give on average. I.e. Cash flows and stock dividend are independent. Table : Comparing Means of Size between Companies give Stock Dividends and Companies dont: Levenes Test for Equality of Variances F Sig. Size Equal variances assumed 4.249 .040 Equal variances not assumed Since P-value of Levenes test = 0.04 which is ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±/2 =0.025 then we dont reject Ho i.e. we assume equal variances Since P-value =0.224 which is ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±/2 =0.025 then we dont reject Ho: My=Mn i.e. we are 95% confident that there is no significant difference in Size between The Companies that give Stock Dividends and the Companies that dont give on average. I.e. Size and stock dividend are independent. Table : Measuring the association between Industry and Stock Dividend: Value Approx. Sig. Uncertainty Coefficient Symmetric .023 .024 stock dividend Dependent .095 .024 Industry Dep endent .013 .024 With Stock Dividend dependent. Since P-value = 0.024 which is less than ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±=0.05 we reject Ho: independence we are 95% confident that Industry and STOCK DIVIDENDS are associated Table : Measuring the association between Ownership structure and Stock Dividend: Value Approx. Sig. Ordinal by Ordinal Gamma .040 .743 Since P-value = 0.743 which is less than ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±=0.05 we dont reject Ho: independence we are 95% confident that build and .private are independent. From the above tables we assume that all the variables cant be included in the logistic regression model except for Industry. The LogisticÃâÃ Regression: Table : the dependent Variable: Original Value Internal Value no 0 yes 1 The Variable of Industry would be recoded into New 28 variable with base category sector 1 to have a binary variable represent each sector with value 1 if the company belongs to that sector and 0 otherwise. Table: Variables Excluded from the Model: Variables not in the Equation Score df Step 0 Variables Industry 38.176 28 Industry(1) 1.607 1 Industry(2) 1.295 1 Industry(3) 3.173 1 Industry(4) 1.100 1 Industry(5) 1.438 1 Industry(6) 1.943 1 Industry(7) 1.929 1 Industry(8) .955 1 Industry(9) .955 1 Industry(10) .955 1 Industry(11) 10.467 1 Industry(12) .290 1 Industry(13) .252 1 Industry(14) .098 1 Industry(15) 1.173 1 Industry(16) .098 1 Industry(17) 3.940 1 Industry(18) .907 1 Industry(19) .955 1 Industry(20) .955 1 Industry(21) .048 1 Industry(22) .048 1 Industry(23) 2.007 1 Industry(24) .048 1 Industry(25) 2.007 1 Industry(26) .048 1 Industry(27) .290 1 Industry(28) .955 1 Overall Statistics 38.176 28 Table : Goodness of fit Chi-square df Sig. Step 1 Step 44. 609 28 .024 Model 44.609 28 .024 Since p-value of step wise =0.024 ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±=0.05 since p-value of model 0.024 ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±=0.05 Then, the model is significant Step Nagelkerke R Square 1 .133 This Model Explains 13.3% of variations in the dependent variable. Table : The Classification table: Classification Tablea,b Observed Predicted stock dividend no yes Step 0 stock dividend no 508 0 yes 80 0 Overall Percentage A. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is .500 The model succeeded to classify all the observations of category 2 but failed to classify any in category 1 which means the model is imbalanced. Variables in the Equation B S.E. Wald df Sig. Step 1a Industry 20.461 28 .847 Industry(1) -.956 1.249 .586 1 .444 Industry(2) -1.030 1.317 .611 1 .434 Industry(3) .654 1.215 .290 1 .591 Industry(4) .223 1.187 .035 1 .851 Industry(5) .000 1.119 .000 1 1.000 Industry(6) -.916 1.212 .571 1 .450 Industry(7) -19.593 1.160E4 .000 1 .999 Industry(8) -19.593 1.641E4 .000 1 .999 Industry(9) -19.593 1.641E4 .000 1 .999 Industry(10) -19.593 1.641E4 .000 1 .999 Industry(11) .916 1.162 .622 1 .430 Industry(12) -.788 1.514 .271 1 .602 Industry(13) .000 1.200 .000 1 1.000 Industry(14) .000 1.342 .000 1 1.000 Industry(15) .357 1.233 .084 1 .772 Industry(16) .000 1.342 .000 1 1.000 Industry(17) -19.593 8.2 04E3 .000 1 .998 Industry(18) -.788 1.250 .398 1 .528 Industry(19) -19.593 1.641E4 .000 1 .999 Industry(20) -19.593 1.641E4 .000 1 .999 Industry(21) .000 1.549 .000 1 1.000 Industry(22) .000 1.549 .000 1 1.000 Industry(23) .916 1.396 .431 1 .512 Industry(24) .000 1.549 .000 1 1.000 Industry(25) .916 1.396 .431 1 .512 Industry(26) .000 1.549 .000 1 1.000 Industry(27) -.788 1.514 .271 1 .602 Industry(28) -19.593 1.641E4 .000 1 .999 Constant -1.609 1.095 2.159 1 .142 a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Industry Since P-value of all coefficients is larger than ÃÆ'Ã ½ÃâÃ ±=0.05 Then all The Coefficients of the Model are insignificant. References: -Afza, Talat and Ch. Slahudin. (2009). Management Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from An Emerging Economy, Corporate Ownership and Control Journal, Vol.6, issue 4, pp.88-95. -Al Kuwari, 2009, Determinants of the Dividend Policy in Emerging Stock Exchanges:The Case of GCC Countries.Global Economy Finance Journal vol. 2 No. 2 September 2009. Pp. 38-63.https://ssrn.com/abstract=1793150 -Al-Malkawi, H. N., 2007, Determinant of Corporate Dividend Policy in Jordan, Journal of Economic and Administrative Since 23, 44-71. -Ambarish, R, K. John and J. Williams, 1987, Efficient Signalling with Dividends and Investments, Journal of Finance 42, 321-343. -Black, F., 1976, The Dividend Puzzle, Journal of Portfolio Management 2, 5-8. -Brennan, M., 1970, Taxes, Market Value and Corporate Financial Policy, National Tax Journal 23, 417-427. -Brigham, F. and J. Gordon, 1968, Leverage, Dividend Policy, and the Cost of Capital, Journal of Finance 23, 85-103 - Darling, P.G. (1957). The Influence of Expectations and Liquidity on Dividend Policy, Journal of Political Economy, 65(3), p 209-224. -De Angelo, Harry, L. De Angelo. and D. J. Skinner (1992). Dividends and Losses, Journal of Finance 47, 1837-1863. -Easterbrook and H. Frank. (1984). Two Agency- Cost Explanations of Dividends, American Economic Re
Saturday, May 23, 2020
Fatherhood in this novel is seen by different shade of colour, not knowing what the true shade really is. There are many turning points which show various stages in being a true father. Therefore, being a father is very difficult, having to overcome obstacles and being strong for each other. A well-known saying Ã¢â¬Å"like father, like sonÃ¢â¬ is evident in this novel by the different ties of relationship each character had. In the novel, The Kite Runner, Khaled Hosseini proves that there is need of a fatherly figure when growing up. Having a father-son bond helps the child differentiate right from wrong. The relationship which demonstrates the need of a father figure is depicted by Baba and Amir, Hassan and Sohrab as well as Amir and Sohrab. AÃ¢â¬ ¦show more contentÃ¢â¬ ¦Hassan stands up against the wrong of the world, like how Baba stood up against the Soviet soldier asking to have a moment with the lady at the back of the truck. Hassan portrays this when the Talibs come to hi s house: Ã¢â¬Å"The Talibs said that he was a liar and a thief like all Hazaras and ordered him to get his family out of the house by Sundown. Hassan protested.Ã¢â¬ Ã¢â¬ ¦ Ã¢â¬Å"They told Hassan they would be moving in to supposedly keep it safe until I return. Hassan protests again. So they took him to the streetÃ¢â¬âÃ¢â¬Å" Ã¢â¬ ¦ Ã¢â¬Å"Ã¢â¬âordered him to kneelÃ¢â¬âÃ¢â¬Å" Ã¢â¬ ¦ Ã¢â¬Å"Ã¢â¬âand shot him in the back of his head.Ã¢â¬ (Hosseini 230-231) Hassan consequently loses his life trying to protect a house which was once BabaÃ¢â¬â¢s. Hassan sacrificed himself to try to save the house like he had done to save AmirÃ¢â¬â¢s blue kite from Assed, eventually causing him to get raped. This is similar to Baba because he had to sacrifice himself to have intercourse with Sanubar to produce a child since Ali was sterile. Hassan allows Sohrab to grow as a person and they both find common ground between themselves. They do this bonding through the slingshot as Sohrab could Ã¢â¬Å"shoot with that slingshotÃ¢â¬ (Hosseini 228-229): Ã¢â¬Å"Ã¢â¬Å"HeÃ¢â¬â¢s great with that slingshotÃ¢â¬ Ã¢â¬ ¦ Ã¢â¬Å"HeÃ¢â¬â¢s inseparable from that thing. He tucks it in the waist of his pants everywhere he goesÃ¢â¬ Ã¢â¬ (Hosseini 265). Hassan is a great example of a father figure who is deeply involved and emotionallyShow MoreRelatedCritical Analysis Of The Kite Runner1090 Words Ã |Ã 5 PagesÃ¢â¬â H 31 October 2017 Consequences of War: A Critical Analysis of the Kite Runner On a day to day basis, an individual is faced with an obstacle they must overcome, ultimately defining their morals and values. In the literature perspective, the novel The Kite Runner delivers multiple thematic ideas that portray the struggles of characters in their ordinary lives. Khaled Hosseini, author and physician, released his debut novel The Kite Runner in the year of 2003. This novel is written in the firstRead MoreThematic Analysis Of The Kite Runner 1377 Words Ã |Ã 6 PagesThematic Analysis of the Kite Runner John Piper once said, Ã¢â¬Å"Redemption is not perfection, the redeemed must realize their mistakes.Ã¢â¬ One can see an idea similar to this in Kahled HosseiniÃ¢â¬â¢s The Kite Runner. In the story, the author sends the message that redemption can be a lifelong pursuit, and until achieved, happiness will not be obtained. The first time the reader is introduced to the theme comes at a time when Amir is feeling as though he is not deserving of his fathers appreciation. Ã¢â¬Å"BecauseRead MoreAnalysis Of The Kite Runner 1016 Words Ã |Ã 5 PagesAccording to the dictionary redemption means Ã¢â¬Å" The act of saving from sinÃ¢â¬ . The kite Runner is about two boys that goes through violence and betrayal in Kabul, Afghanistan. One of the main characters Amir decided not to help his best friend caused their conflicts to grow. This reveals the theme of redemption throughout the Kite Runner. Most importantly, there is a motivation behind why Amir battles very nearly his whole existence with reclamation and that is on the grounds that Amir s hirelingRead MoreAnalysis Of The Kite Runner1078 Words Ã |Ã 5 Pages The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini, a story of a boy as he unravels his journey throughout his life. The novel consists of multiple themes such as love, friendship, betrayal, guilt, , secrets, loyalty, and redemption. As the main character, Amir recalls his past events, all of these themes start to unravel specific events that occurred in his life. Ã¢â¬Å"There is a way to be good againÃ¢â¬ (Hosseini 2) is where the novel unfolds the deep dark life of AmirÃ¢â¬â¢s regret and guilt, BabaÃ¢â¬â¢s secret, and HassanÃ¢â¬â¢sRead MoreThe Kite Runner Analysis1237 Words Ã |Ã 5 Pageshow political power such as the Taliban can bring out the evil in people but he also demonstrates how there is oppressive male power in relationships that also brings out the same human nature. He uses overbearing masculine characters in the The Kite Runner and gender roles to express how men were given the right to act in such horrific ways towards women. In Afghanistan there are many restrictions aga inst women. Men have control over their wives and girlfriends. They have the dominant power and sinceRead MoreThe Kite Runner Analysis772 Words Ã |Ã 4 PagesThe Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini was a touching book that revolved around loyalty within a friendship. The friendship between Hassan and Amir had some difficulties. A true friendship can be hard to find(,) but can be one of the most vital things to being truly happy. Both Hassan and Amir had proven their loyalty to each other by the end of The Kite Runner. Loyalty was a crucial part in Hassan and AmirÃ¢â¬â¢s friendship. Ã Ã Ã In the beginning, Hassan was not only loyal to Amir because that was his dutyRead MoreCritical Analysis Of The Kite Runner 1899 Words Ã |Ã 8 PagesCritical Analysis of The Kite Runner Ã¢â¬Å"It may be unfair, but what happens in a few days, sometimes even a single day, can change the course of a whole lifetimeÃ¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ (142). Khaled HosseiniÃ¢â¬â¢s The Kite Runner unfolds the story of the affluent youth Amir and his servant friend Hassan, who are separated by a traumatizing sexual assault and the 1979 Soviet Union invasion of Afghanistan. Despite a fresh start in San Francisco, Amir is devoured by guilt for failing to protect his loyal friend. Many years laterRead MoreLiterary Analysis Of The Kite Runner 1229 Words Ã |Ã 5 PagesShyanne Nobles Ms. Mastrokyriakos English 4A Literary Analysis on Ã¢â¬Å"The Kite RunnerÃ¢â¬ Edward Michael a British adventurer, writer and television presenter of Man vs. Wild always says Ã¢â¬Å"survival can be summed up in three words - never give up. ThatÃ¢â¬â¢s the heart of it really. Just keep tryingÃ¢â¬ . The Kite Runner is a fictional book with a heartbreaking plot and struggling characters that are easily sympathetic to the readers. An Afghani child that has to make life changing decisions at such a young ageRead MoreAnalysis Of The Kite Runner 1229 Words Ã |Ã 5 PagesThe Kite RunnerÃ¢â¬â¢s plot is centered on the story of Amir, a young boy who grew up in Afghanistan with his father, and friend, Hassan. Amir was raised without a mother, and had no womanly influence in his life until he was married. This lack of women in the storyline has caused some to argue that the novel is demeaning to women (Gomez). The vulgar language and explicit themes are seen as demoralizing towards the female gender (Schaub). In the novel the women are required to remain committ ed and submissiveRead MoreAnalysis Of The Kite Runner 1359 Words Ã |Ã 6 Pages One major theme that is evident in The Kite Runner is that scars are reminders of lifeÃ¢â¬â¢s pain and regret, and, though you can ease the regret and the scars will fade, neither will completely go away. We all have regrets and always will, but though it will be a long hard process we can lessen them through redemption. The majority of The Kite Runner is about the narrator and protagonist, Amir. Almost all of the characters in The Kite Runner have scars, whether they are physical or emotional. Baba